[streak]

Not fake Robert..

[Squeaky]

Please tell me why. Teaj, me and others have doubts. Doesn;t Superstar 3 suggest there is somehting fishy going on. It kinda gives me an iPhony-feeling.

[streak]

Vern.. It doesn't matter how cheap they were. You mustn't buy fakes! Get a refund and distroy them!

[Sweet_Kicks]

Some nice pick ups gents, and what Streak said Vern without the spelling error though

[Teaj]

To me the superstar IIIs look genuine, in terms of quality. I'm just not sure the Superstar III really existed?

These were a pair I ended up with a few years back and they were definite fakes.... but they look a lot worse than Robs (look at that box!!).



http://www.superstardb.com/showthread.php?tid=2767

Perhaps those ones were just a fake version of Robs legit ones? But it's strange not to have more info around on the 'Superstar III' - they're nice shoes, not like Superstar 2Gs etc, but dont seem too different from IIs to warrant being called IIIs!

[benji]

So they're genuine, quite rare and no-one knows much about them... there is something interesting about this case..

Rob they are definitely worth the purchase for the intrigue alone.

[Fritze]

Hehe ... bought a similar pair on the bay a while ago. After looking at them I knew they were fake.
Seems that they had the same fty and art numbers as yours Tom. I got a refund and threw them in the bin.





Compared to a genuine pair the stitching was horrible.

Your pair is definitely looking better Rob but I would compare them to other pairs you have. Could help.

Like the green 80s fieldsy

[Fieldsy1971]

Cheers Fritze....they'll be getting an outing this weekend...

[GeeBee]

I think yours are fine Rob . . . I've got an identical pair I bought from Lurky and they're one of the comfiest pairs I have.
The flaking on the heel just happens with some old supes.

[Tifoso]

I wore my green 80's just yesterday. Love 'em.

Got these today.